danaxcon.blogg.se

Mmpi 2 validity and reliability
Mmpi 2 validity and reliability





mmpi 2 validity and reliability

The association between mental health problems and chronic pain is consistent with the bio-psychosocial perspective of pain (Gatchel, McGeary, McGeary, & Lippe, 2014 Gatchel, Peng, Peters, Fuchs, & Turk, 2007). These rates are meaningfully higher than the general population, which produces mood and anxiety disorder prevalence rates of 9.5% and 18.1%, respectively (Kessler, Chiu, Dernier, & Walters, 2005). The 12-month prev­ alence of mood disorders in this population was 17.5% and the rate for anxiety disorders was 26.5%.

mmpi 2 validity and reliability

Replication sample (Kessler et al., 2004) and found that those with chronic back pain were at increased risk for mood and anxiety disorders, as well as substance use disorders. (2005) in­ vestigated the prevalence of mental disorders among individuals reporting chronic spinal pain in the National Comorbidity Survey Additionally, low back pain patients present with substantial rates of comorbid psychopathology. The prevalence of the disorder has increased with one study reporting that the point prevalence of chronic low back pain rose from 3.9% in 1992 to 10.2% in 2006- over a 160% increase in a 14-year period (Freburger et al., 2009). The condition leads to approximately 100 to 200 billion dollars in losses per year, prin­ cipally because of diminished wages and productivity (Katz, 2006). Overall, about 149 million work days per year are lost because of low back pain (Guo, Tanaka, Halperin, & Cameron, 1999). The con­ dition is the second leading cause of disability in the United States (McNeil & Binette, 2001) and after the common cold, the leading reason for sick days (LaBar, 1992). Prevalence estimates indicate that approximately 80% of the population will experience low back pain at some point (Rubin, 2007). Keywords: chronic pain, chronic low back pain, MMPI-2-RF, construct validity, applied assessmentĬhronic low back pain is a significant problem. Implications of these findings and limitations of this study are discussed. Results indicated reliability and validity for most of the MMPI-2-RF substantive scales. We calculated internal consistency coefficients, mean-item correlations, and SEM for all substantive scales, as well as zero-order correlations with collateral medical record information and self-report testing.

mmpi 2 validity and reliability

Ben-Porath Kent State University The purpose of the current study was to investigate the reliability and concurrent validity of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)-2-Restructured Form (2-RF) (Ben-Porath & Tellegen, 2008/ 2011) scores in a sample of 811 chronic low back pain patients (346 males, 529 females) beginning treatment in a short-term interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program. TarescavageĬleveland Clinic Foundation, Neurological Center for Pain, Cleveland, Ohio Reliability and Validity of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) in Evaluations of Chronic Low Back Pain Patients Anthony M.







Mmpi 2 validity and reliability